Home » People & Culture » Late Night Politics

Late Night Politics

President Obama’s appearance on the Late Show with David Letterman was a brilliant performance for many reasons.  The most obvious was the simple and direct way he related his goals and how he hoped to achieve them, casually bringing the whole country into his inner circle.  Less obvious was how he closed the loop, connecting politics and entertainment in a way that we usually like to deny.  That’s where the future of the Obama administration starts to look far more interesting than just a series of policy choices and potential accomplishments.

The big laugh-line was when he was asked early on whether Pres. Carter was correct to say that much of the criticism leveled at him was based on racism.  Obama told us, “I was actually black before the election,” and proceeded to make an appeal to his mandate to show we’re all above this now.  It was as daring as it was funny, but it shows how serious Obama is at perfecting the mythology and archetype of an Electoral Leader.  An excellent study of this type of leadership is defined by Garry Wills in Certain Trumpets as personified by FDR and his Fireside Chats:

Roosevelt’s seated-in-the-room-with-you style gave a shock of intimacy.  This was a new thing in people’s relation to their president.  … People felt that Roosevelt, unlike his predecessors, was confiding in them, consulting them.

This type of leader is defined by his or her followers, which is to say ultimately by their connection with the people they lead.  FDR, for example, would often suddenly change direction to meet public opinion even as he worked to shape it.  Obama has yet to make any significant reversals but has indeed backed off from calls for single payer health care.  Like FDR, he’s there to lead people, not yell at them.  To do this, he has to be a different type of president for a different generation.

As he spelled out his goals carefully, it became clear that Obama is going to keep his eyes on the prize and act strategically to solve problems.  But doing this on a show billed as entertainment put to lie the label of “politics” that is put on what is clearly nothing more than pure entertainment as talking heads and more than a few bloggers struggle to advance their own careers over the public good.

There are only a few useful definitions of “politics”.  The first is that it is the operating system of government, the hashing out of policy.  The second is that it is the art and science of human interaction, or how we use it in the phrases “Office politics” or “Domestic politics”.  I would add that politics is about improving people lives, not power or influence (to paraphrase Eleanor Roosevelt).

By any of these standards, people zinging each other for a temporary advantage in an obscure game are not engaging in politics, but nothing more than entertainment.  Most of what passes for “politics” is, in fact, irrelevant as any kind of policy or method for people to interact in any kind of constructive way.  It certainly doesn’t improve people’s lives.

If what passes for politics is actually a cheap form of entertainment, for real politics we have to turn to entertainment shows.  I’ve said for years that the only nooze show worth watching is the Daily Show with Jon Stewart.  To see Letterman give Obama the time on platform to actually talk about how he will lead completes the circle.  Only the lead-in by the band and the heart shaped potato made it look like entertainment, not politics.

Like FDR before him, Obama has a tough task.  He is tackling it by appealing to a style of leadership that requires a constant reassuring dialogue, a connection to the people of the nation.  It’s how we get past the learned helplessness that has been fed by the perception that politics is some kind of inside game played by professionals who have the right connections.  Once we realize that they are nothing more than entertainment we have a shot at engaging the great numbers of people who have given up.

It’s actually easy.  All we have to do is have actual politics, the real deal, on our entertainment shows.  That, and ignore the noise.

Advertisements

7 thoughts on “Late Night Politics

  1. There are plenty of people on both the left and the right that hurl insults at each other and call it “politics”. It doesn’t help a thing. I saw Obama and he was brilliant! We do need more of that, and if it has to be on letterman than so be it!

  2. I definitely see people on both sides exploiting what they call “politics” for their own very small careers. It happens on both teevee and in the blog world, and it’s very sad.

    Most of what I see on CNN is not politics. It is shabby attempts at entertainment done by people who are terribly not funny. The blogs that peddle this nonsense are, indeed, nowhere near as well read as they’d like you to think no matter how much they link to each other – either to praise or damn. It’s all show, no substance.

    The substance was there on Letterman. People need to realize that they can, indeed, connect to politics and take it over form the elitist “in crowd” that likes to think they run it now. Obama got around them very well.

    No matter what people think about him or his policies, I hope we can disagree based on what’s real and not the relentless chatter – on both sides.

  3. Pingback: Twitter Trackbacks for Late Night Politics « Barataria – the work of Erik Hare [erikhare.wordpress.com] on Topsy.com

  4. Pingback: Erik Hare (wabbitoid) 's status on Monday, 05-Oct-09 01:03:36 UTC - Identi.ca

  5. Pingback: Lighter than Air « Barataria – the work of Erik Hare

Like this Post? Hate it? Tell us!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s