Every election year, it’s critical to evoke the Founding Fathers. What plan for a strong military would be complete without the spurious blessing of the Father of The Country, George Washington? How could you float a plan for tax givebacks, er, reform without evoking the Father of Liberty, Thomas Jefferson? Who would dare enter a conversation about the sanctity of our national credit without the hallowed words of Alexander Hamilton – or, indeed, his apparent ability to sing and dance his way to 16 Tony nominations?
No one, that’s who. But the process of doing so actually invokes one of the most important Founding Fathers of all, Felix Walker. His contribution to politics is nearly endless and absolutely critical.
Felix Walker, after all, was a US Representative from Buncombe Country, North Carolina, and as such gave us the concept of “bunk”.
The details of Walker’s life are, appropriately, a bit sketchy. He was born in what is now West Virginia in 1753, but moved around the southern colonies a lot. Walker fought in the Revolution with North Carolina and went on to represent the Tarheel State in Congress in from 1817 – 1823. That’s where he made his mark on politics forever.
The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was slogging its way through the legislative process like anything contentious, which is to say slowly and painfully. For those not familiar with the bill, it declared half of the state would be pronounced “mis-sour-EE” and the other half “mis-sour-AH”.
No, actually, the legislation was a complex package which admitted Missouri as a slave state, Maine as a free state, everything north of Missouri would be free states in the future, and, most importantly, Congressmen would continue to hate each other but not actually shoot at their opponents for 41 years.
At the end of the mind numbing process which produced this compromise Walker rose to speak. His narrative, titled “Speech for Buncombe”, was very long. So long, in fact, that the rest of the House was afraid he’d keep talking until the Civil War arrived right on schedule.
They yelled at him, “Stop!”, “Please, please stop!” and “Stop or I’ll kill myself!” It was all in vain. Walker was determined to get up there and ramble on about the people back home – almost certainly so that he could tell them their voice was heard on this critical legislation. Nevermind that no one could hear him over the wailing, whining, and shouting in the House chamber.
At this great juncture in US history, the House had to pause for its usual nonsense – elevated to an art form. It was a moment to remember.
Remember it, we do, because “Buncombe” joined the English language to describe meaningless political speech for purely electoral purposes. Spelled “bunkum” and later shortened to “bunk”, it came to mean, “foolish or untrue words”. It’s essentially the same thing.
Which, naturally, brings us to Trump. How much is he the undisputed king of bunk, by any definition you care to use? It’s best to ask the popular “de-bunking” site, politifact.com, which evaluates statements and tabulates results by candidates. If there is a better antidote to mind-numbing nonsense than mind-numbing data please let us all know.
Seriously, there has to be a better way to refute this nonsense.
How do today’s candidates score? After evaluating 579 statements by President Obama, politifact found 21% were “true” and 27% were “mostly true” – a net truth rating of 48%. Similar results were found for Sanders, 51% true, and Clinton, 50% true.
Trump? His net rating was 2% “true” and 6% “mostly true” for a net truth score of only 8%. His score is very similar to that of “chain emails” at 6% overall. It’s incredible!
Seriously, since we’re on word origins here, Trump really is “not credible”.
Where would we be without the contribution of Rep Felix Walker, the original Voice of Buncombe? Like all great men of the past, Walker’s nonsense was probably well grounded in eloquence and grand ideas. Today’s practitioners probably can’t hold a candle to his rhetorical ability as they make up whatever BS works for the moment. Yet this is all conjecture since Walker’s speech was not written down and is remembered only as gibberish which interrupted an historic moment.
That, ultimately, is the moral of this story.
Pingback: Buncombe | Enough of The Global Hidden 1%
AWESOME! In Written Form – History that needs remembered – in showing how history of humans links to today – Enjoyed Immensely! AND seriously, if my only choice is for Clinton or Trump come November, I’m thinking about slitting my throat rather than voting – but, figure they are counting on that take, so coming up with some kind of plan B that involves massive strike on things that affect GDP – 🙂 Bravo, Erik! For a well written piece! 🙂
(By the Way – does anyone else think it is the height of stupidity that WP recognizes my login for me to ‘like’ and show my gravatar, but makes me re-load the page in order to post a comment? I could talk gibberish for 2 hours, but bottom line, many, many are racing forward way past where their feet are, just now – hunkered down and ready to watch what happens…. 🙂
Thank you! And sorry that the comments section is periodically messed up. I don’t understand it, myself. Things seem to mysteriously break and then fix themselves.
Lol. I got an email awhile ago asking if I would please allow a reblog. Hadn’t changed anything… didn’t change anything and reblog worked fine a day later. 🙂 WP is a never ending work-in-progress. Lol
Good blog. No mystery that Trump is about as true as chain emails, thats where he gets his information for sure.
Well, that would make sense, yes. 🙂
I always wondered where that word came from! Wild story, good ending to it. Way too much BS all around. What Obama says is half true? Who da thunk it? 🙂
In a world where half of the people think Obama and Clinton always lie and the other half think they always tell the truth, it’s a bit closer to 50/50. 🙂 Seriously, they rarely tell outright lies – but Trump most certainly does. It’s a big difference.
Its all just so much bs, I am sick of it! I’m surprised he tells the truth that much. How do people support this total fraud?
I think 8% is about as low as anyone can go – it’s almost what you’d expect entirely by accident. Yes, he’s a total fraud. People support him because they are convinced everyone else are total frauds – which honestly I don’t get at all. Then again, the Republicans have been saying very wrong things for a long time so perhaps many people are just used to it – or cannot figure out what is true on their own anymore.