Home » People & Culture » State of the Union: Serious

State of the Union: Serious

Barack Obama delivered his State of the Union Address on Tuesday night.  That might seem like a long time ago when it comes to standard news cycles, but I decided that someone has to take their time when responding to think it through a bit.  If you’re already tired of this analysis, I’ll understand.

Immediately after the speech, people tended to criticize it for being long.  An hour or so out of your life isn’t that much for a President to ask, so hopefully we can get past the issues of presentation and get into the meat of it.  I will provide links to past articles to explain where I am coming from in more detail as I go.

Long Focus: Obama mentioned several times that he inherited a terrible mess that was made over a period of a decade or more.  That was labeled as “whining” or a “blame game” by some commentators, but I think that the simple truth of this has stuck in the general population.  That means that people are beginning to develop some patience for what has to be done.

Jobs: As many of you know, I’ve been asking for a major jobs program for over a year now.  The reason that this is essential is not simply the 10% unemployment by the U3 measure or the 18% by broader U6.  The problem is that an entire generation is having trouble finding their first job.   The size of this problem shows the potential payback if we invest in this generation now.  I wanted a lot more than a few paltry billion bucks (ha!) in a real jobs program.  I also wish that more was said about the barriers to job creation that are built up in our economy.  In all, I got about half of what I wanted, and I’ll take it.

Republicans:
The main Republican argument was that we needed even more on jobs and that we wasted a year putzing around.  I actually tend to agree with that.  More than just agreeing with it, I am absolutely delighted that Republicans are talking about job creation.  That means that something may happen.  When the Republicans talk job creation, they usually mean tax breaks – but if we can steer that towards reduction in payroll and payroll-related taxes we could have a big win for job creation.  What matters most is that the Republicans are interested in a populist issue whether they show fear in their eyes or not.

Serious: If there was one thing that Obama wanted to get across, it was that the situation was dire but he was on it.  He didn’t talk about Depressions or any of the other scary things, but he injected a much needed tone of seriousness into the debate without causing panic.  That’s the most important thing he had to do.   He turned his biggest weakness, the TARP bailout, into a sure sign of strength that showed he was both willing to do what he had to but serious that we weren’t gonna be ripped off.  That was what worked best – and will stay with us the longest.

Exports: I didn’t get this part at all.  I had the feeling that his administration wants to do something to help create manufacturing jobs but has no idea what the Hell they are talking about.  That scared me a little.  Do they understand that about the only serious way to increase exports is to lower the value of the US dollar, but they’re afraid to let that happen?  This could reveal a bit internal rift.

Other Stuff: I didn’t care about all the other stuff, and I’ll bet no one did.  Yes, this was a State of the Union Address and that means you have to mention how we’re doin’ just about every way there is.  He’s covered the wars in better detail elsewhere, and that’s just fine.

What did I learn from this address?  That Obama is taking an inside and bureaucratic approach to being our nation’s top manager, working down his “To Do” list of fires that need to be put out.  I expect a little more in the way of appearances to bolster his populist image for a while, but I do not see a major public role over the long haul.  His agenda is about fixing what’s wrong in Washingtoon, which is badly needed and long overdue.  Whether or not it’s actually working will be hard to judge from the outside, meaning that he’ll need that patience he tried to instill in the public.

I’m patient.  I took two days to think this over before I criticized the speech.  Let’s see what happens in the next year before we get too excited.

8 thoughts on “State of the Union: Serious

  1. I totally agree that the main message was that things are serious but he’s on it. I found him very reassuring, I think more than you did. I think he answered all the charges leveled by Republicans well. If they want to create jobs, let’s create jobs!

  2. I think you’re asking Obama for too much when it comes to jobs. He is taking the long view, which is something I thought you were into. It may be slow, but I do think that they have stabilized the system.

    It is strange that we have not seen him a lot lately. I expected him to be out and around all the time but he stays in DC.

  3. Nice comments from all three. A different way less partisan of looking at it. Ann, I think things got shook up with some security breaches in the past few months and traveling less and governing more may be in the cards.

  4. I think we learned that Obama is mortal. He is doing his best and whether or not that is good enough only time will tell. I do appreciate you waiting to try to take a longer view on the address – but let’s try this again in a month and see if our opinion changed.

  5. Thanks, everyone.

    Anna and Jim, you’re right. Long term isn’t two daze.

    Dan: I hope that’s all it was. I’d like to see him out there a bit more, not on a continuous campaign, but when he speaks things do calm down. That’s the real reason I want more.

    I didn’t talk about this right away because in politics taking a stand is one thing but the reaction is another. One thing that is very clear to me – the right has chilled bigtime.

    During the address, the live tweets I saw from righties were … well, silly at best. They would criticize Obama for how he ordered breakfast.

    Afterwards? The focus on jobs has become a game-changer, I think. It’s populist, but not in the “out for blood” way that the base is used to. The noise level has gone way, way down.

    That is, to my mind, THE GOAL for Democrats – to keep the noise level a lot lower.

    It’s also what our nation needs, IMHO. Let’s see if it can hold.

  6. People are taking things much more seriously lately. I think they realize what a depression really is. If the Republicans refuse to help get us out of this situation, we need to label them as ‘traitors’ and stuff just like they did to us. They are bringing this nation down far more than any Democrat ever did.

  7. Pingback: George Washington Carver « Barataria – the work of Erik Hare

  8. Pingback: Patently Absurd « Barataria – the work of Erik Hare

Like this Post? Hate it? Tell us!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s