Home » People & Culture » Craftsmanship


Woodworking is a strategic craft.  It often starts with a plan, but it may start with a irresistible chunk of raw wood that seems destined to be an expression of beauty.  In either case, the goals are formulated, the steps outlined and the tools sharpened.  Perfecting the craft itself isn’t much different.  The woodworking his or her self is the block of uncut wood, molded and shaped through years of practice, mentorship and gobs of quantity time with other devotees of the art.  Together, it is the Way of the Craftsman – patient yet active, contemplative yet expressive.

It’s also the way that I approach writing.  I believe many others do as well, but I very much wish that this view was universal.

Only a few generations ago the art of writing for an audience was restricted to a small and rather elite class for the simple reason that printing isn’t cheap.  If it went on paper, it had to be quality. That doesn’t mean that every story in every newspaper was a work of art, but a certain level of craftsmanship was necessary to even get a job as a reporter.  The selection process that separated those who “made it” brought an aura of romance to the art.  A lot of people ached to be writers, but few really made it.

Today, dead trees and the lead of the press aren’t an issue.  There’s a lot more writing than there used to be, and just about anyone can find some kind of audience.  For some people, the lingering sense of romance and a desire to see their name in print drives them far more than the craft itself – and they can create an audience in ways unimaginable a generation ago.  On top of all this, the internet has created a greater demand for specialized writing to sell stuff, explain stuff, or hook readers into a new medium.

As the total demand for writing has gone up, the law of supply and demand would suggest that the value of it would go up as well.  But with this offset by a greater supply, in many ways it’s harder to make a living a writer now than ever before.  How did that happen?

Quantity replacing quality requires mechanization, and that’s what has happened.  The craft of writing is being shoved aside not by the business of writing, which has always been there, but by the demands for more of it.  Coupling this with a sense of romance left over from a previous generation only makes things worse.

I happen to believe that anyone can learn to be a better writer, just as I believe anyone can be a woodworker if the want to be.  It comes down to the Way of the Craftsman.    As long as people have access to the patient teachers and brothers and sisters who are dedicated to The Way, quality will have a place.  Readers, too, have a critical part to play now that they have more opportunities to be writers themselves in turns – and reading is writing no matter what.

The competitive nature of writing today works against the Way of the Craftsman because it isolates writers behind walls of desire and jealousy.  It comes from images of dashing young Hemingways, troubled Fitzgeralds, and pithy Vonneguts lost in today’s more mechanical approach.  The ghosts of the past as well as the harsh realities of the present are both to blame.

Imagine, instead, a garage converted into a workshop.  Anyone can stop by for a chat or borrow a chisel.  The sense of expression, either our own voice or the subtle voice of the raw material, is put in its proper place – second to the craft that makes it possible.  Now replace the uncut wood with the English language and see what the Way of the Craftsman can build once we ditch the fake romance and competitive impulses.

The Way of the Craftsman is what should tie us all together, just as writing itself ties together people and fills the spaces in between.  The future of writing is that we either focus on the craft or give way to mechanical mass production.  I know which way has a life I want to live.

12 thoughts on “Craftsmanship

  1. Interesting post, Sir. I offer a few comments:
    I think you’ve missed one element of the writer’s craft that I still believe separates the wheat from the chaff, so to speak – and that is the individual’s level of talent.

    I agree that most any intelligent person can, with labor and study, improve their writing skills – but only to a certain level of competence. If an individual’s talent (for lack of a better word) doesn’t contain a spark of genius, I feel no amount of effort will let them reach the highest rank.

    It isn’t a bad thing that one’s skill is less than that of the genius. It takes many more journeymen than geniuses to make the world go.

    I admit that the above contains a thread of justification – and while I do admire and respect genius (in many fields), I have enjoyed and been comfortable with many, many more journeymen.

  2. Pingback: Scene, Unseen « Barataria – the work of Erik Hare

  3. Pingback: Quality « Barataria – the work of Erik Hare

  4. Pingback: Blank Slate « Barataria – the work of Erik Hare

  5. Pingback: George Washington Carver « Barataria – the work of Erik Hare

  6. Pingback: Storytelling « Barataria – the work of Erik Hare

  7. Pingback: Total Marketing « Barataria – the work of Erik Hare

  8. Pingback: Nurses’ Strike « Barataria – the work of Erik Hare

  9. Pingback: A Glimpse of the Future | Social Media Solutions by Erik Hare

  10. Pingback: Saint Paul’s Community School Plan | Barataria – The work of Erik Hare

  11. Pingback: Value of Information | Barataria – The work of Erik Hare

  12. Pingback: Scene, Unseen | Barataria – The work of Erik Hare

Like this Post? Hate it? Tell us!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s