Home » Nooze » Consensus


Tens of thousands of people have filled the Capitol grounds in Madison.  They have taken over the marble hall itself, banging on the doors of the Senate Chamber and making noise not normally heard in Wisconsin outside of a Harley rally.  The Senate Democrats have fled the state, stopping all action for lack of a quorum.  It’s hardly business as usual in a state that is generally known for hard work and quiet contemplation, at least when the Packers aren’t playing.  What will happen?

The way out is the same way that the good people of Wisconsin and all over the USofA have gotten through this before.  Our traditions, sometime enshrined in our Constitutions, laws, and legislative rules are all there for some very good reasons.

Demonstrations were quite common in Wisconsin back when Bob LaFollette was still around. “Free men of every generation must combat renewed efforts of organized force and greed to destroy liberty,” he told a crowd in Madison during his 1924 run for President under the Progressive Party. He carried the state.  No one should be surprised to see this surface again in the same place – but shock is the common reaction in the national media.  The same lack of understanding of history – or anything outside of immediate reach and the moment – has made useful analysis of turmoil incredibly rare.  That’s as true of protests in Madison as it was in Tunis and Cairo.

It doesn’t have to be this way.  A few steps back can show us how we got here, and a few more steps back can show us how we get out.

The US has a complicated political system that reaches far deeper than the ink on our Constitution.  It is not based on rough majority rule, but on Consensus.  The Founding Fathers were a diverse group who naturally agreed on nothing when they found themselves deep in a crisis.  It took them months of arguing and frustration before they were able to break the ice with a clear statement of the obvious by Benjamin Franklin:

“We must all hang together, or assuredly we shall all hang separately.”

The only reason anyone can talk of the Founding Fathers, or their intents, as a single unit is because of their commitment to Consensus.  Jefferson and Paine wanted to incite calls to action with fiery rhetoric, while John Adams wanted to stand firmly on basic principles.  They brought it all together because they knew they had to.  When it came time later to write a Constitution that enshrined their experience in a government that could withstand the ravages of time, they applied their lessons firmly.  The argument over state representation versus popular representation was decided by having two houses, one of many compromises that were made to achieve Consensus and enable them to move forward as one.

These were men who knew that draconian action in response to a crisis was the main tool of tyrants.  They spelled this out clearly and carefully, leaving no doubts for all history.  Their system was one that rejected majority rule and set up mechanisms that demanded each new generation would have to find a way to Consensus, just as they did.

That is why there are rules that allow one US Senator to place a “hold” on legislation, a device used by Republicans heavily over the last two years to thwart the majority of the US Senate.  That is why there is a need for a quorum larger than a majority in the Wisconsin State Senate, a clear attempt to prevent a simple majority from ramming through legislation without Consensus.  These rules exist for good reasons.

This is more than theoretical. In our own time, response to an emergency was used to pass the “Patriot Act”, something that has led to actual US Citizens submitting to full body searches and scans just to board an airplane.  The Founding Fathers knew that emergencies are how liberty is lost.  They tried to warn us, but the lessons have to be learned by each generation.

Without a strong commitment to the strength of unity, our system does not work.  When Consensus appears slow and cumbersome nothing winds up happening – by design.  That is when the citizens of the nation have always marched. It may seem backwards, but when politicians abandon their commitment to deliberation that builds Consensus it has to play out in the streets.

This is our system.  This is our history.  This is who we are.

The bill pending in Madison is an attempt to use an emergency situation to needlessly gut public unions who have already agreed to pay and benefit cuts.  The attempt to use majority rule to strip rights is a classic power move by tyrants, and it is being met by a combination of raucous action and clever use of the rules.  The only way out is for everyone to commit to Consensus, the great tradition that made our nation united and free.

Meanwhile, a sleeping giant may have woken up.  The need for Consensus may have slipped out of the reach of politicians who have been either too lazy or greedy to work for it.  Consensus may have to come from the people through a process not enshrined in the great ink of our past but sometimes in blood.  We will see if the spirit of Fightin’ Bob LaFollette is rising again from Madison.  If that is the case, we are a long way from having our system work the way it was set up to.  But this is still very much part of our tradition, as the Tea Party people were very quick to point out just a short time ago.

Consensus will come, but only once we all commit ourselves to it.  Things have a long way to play out before that happens.  But that is how it works.

22 thoughts on “Consensus

  1. I get the feeling no one listens to anyone else anymore. We have a long way to go if we have to live up to our traditions but I think you are right that we have to. Something will have to give.

  2. I think it’s vital for us to understand that Unity is critical to our system as we know it. The rhetoric being employed by the Blogging Brigade is usually all about being “right”, not about moving forward. The result is that we haven’t been able to move anything forward in a long time. So our crisis deepens.

    We’ve been there before. My argument is a very conservative one on purpose. I don’t see how anyone can call themselves a “conservative” and not take the long view. But, once again, our tradition is one of Progress – meaning that no matter how far we look back we see the great figures of our history looking us squarely in the eyes. What are we going to do, today?

    Our system is designed to fail toward inaction when the commitment to Consensus breaks down. The result has always spilled into the streets. There is no surprise here, none at all. This has to happen. Let’s do it up right and make it work.

  3. Good article even if I disagree with you somewhat. I also think the Wisconsin democratic state party acted in bad faith the prior two years. Sometimes it seems that the statehouse just boils down to education funding since that compromises 40% of the budget. I think it would be interesting to find any linkage here between the Wisconsin Catholic church and their schools and some of the past electoral activity.

  4. Its interesting to read about the peripheral issues in the bill. It seems that removing Medicaid decisions from the legislative process, and the sales of state infrastructure such as power and heating plants to private entities should have been up for public discussion…

  5. Dan, it’s about the same here – in percent and the effort put into it. We do have to start thinking about K-12 and what it costs. That’s why I did my piece on becoming a teacher along with Eric Austin – I think we need to talk about this issue at great length, from the bottom up. I’m also a big supporter of Charter Schools. I doubt any one thing will solve the situation, but I really do want to talk about it. Yes, the Democrats haven’t done their job to prevent this mess, either.

    Ron, you raise some points I glossed over when reading about this, too. I saw those mentioned in the Milwaukee Journal (a great paper!) and just kept reading. They have to plug the budget gap, that’s a given. The rest should be put up for a lot more engagement. There’s a fine line between quick action (which is needed in so many areas!) and the need for consensus. As I said earlier, putting things off without discussion is making emergencies that are forcing things to go down very badly:
    No Decision, Big Decision

    Dan and Ron, I hope you can see this post as the book-end of that last one. Our hands are being forced and bad decisions are being made quickly. I think you are both right on here.

  6. I was chatting with one fellow last night, and the thinking is, if this bill passes, which seems more a matter of when,than if, that there will be a real push towards alternative educational paths… effectively turning public schools into a net of last resort.

    On the gloom and doom side, such might well turn into an educational I-35 tragedy, not just in WI, but likely something replicated nation wide. On the other hand, with the lack of leadership/decision making capability, perhaps such a race to the bottom is near inevitable anyhow.

    Yet, even within a major crash and burn, new shoots do come up. Even in the worst public school system, there are pockets of greatness.

  7. I would urge you to go to the nearest big library downtown. Pick up the Feburary 24th issue of The New York Review of Books and read Andrew Hacker’s piece on where are the jobs? The article is mostly about education and is not told from a right or left point of view.

  8. @Dan, I’m too far away to get that book, but I did take a look at the references Mr Hacker used, the main one of which shows incredible growth. I went over it a multitude of times, and just cant see where the numbers are coming from. Perhaps someone who can access it could shed some light on those projections.

  9. Dan, I think this is a part of that review you were talking about. The book is by Anthony Carnevale, Nicole Smith, and Jeff Strohl at Georgetown University

    I don’t know where they get the numbers, either. It runs against some of what I have seen where people do not need college degrees as much as they did in the past. But it does confirm that job growth is going to be difficult for 10 yrs or more. That is frightening.

  10. I don’t know who can predict the next 10 years all well, but we can be sure that it will be slower than we’ve seen in the past. I’m a big fan of bounded chaos as methodology, and we can be sure that the bounds will be lower than we expect.

    We’ll see. In the meantime, the survey sez I should be writing less politics. 🙂

  11. Pingback: State of Jobs | Barataria – The work of Erik Hare

  12. I think I’ll revisit some of this tomorrow. I’m pretty sick of the War on Reality that is going on out there.

    If Walker really needs concessions like this, he should explain why. That’s all I’m asking at this point.

  13. Pingback: Post Imperial | Barataria – The work of Erik Hare

  14. Pingback: Climate | Barataria – The work of Erik Hare

  15. Pingback: Gotcha! | Barataria – The work of Erik Hare

  16. Pingback: Fault Tolerance | Barataria – The work of Erik Hare

  17. Pingback: Four Years On | Barataria – The work of Erik Hare

  18. Pingback: O Brother, Where Art Thou? | Barataria – The work of Erik Hare


  20. Pingback: Founding Fathers | Barataria – The work of Erik Hare

  21. Pingback: After the Storm | Barataria – The work of Erik Hare

Like this Post? Hate it? Tell us!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s