Home » People & Culture » “Civics”


While sorting out the goals and needs of People’s Economics, one thing stands out: how do we wind up with some general agreement on the system(s) of our world?  That’s where this piece, first run two years ago, comes in.  

Driving down the interstate, your safe travel and even your life depends a lot on the competence of many other people. Sure, there is a body of law and court precedent and paid agreements with insurance companies that enforces the basic codes of decency and safety. But in the end it really comes down to the skill and attention of comrades in gasoline and steel being at their best not just casually but constantly.

Of course this fails from time to time, but considering how much time people spend behind the wheel it’s amazingly seamless and simple. The system largely works – we all get there nearly all the time. We depend on each other to not be stupid and the vast majority of the time it comes together.

This basic lesson in civics is a good place to start as the nation unravels into some kind of dark hole that frankly promises to only become darker with time. It’s a thought experiment, a self-taught lesson worth thinking through by malcontents and eggheads alike, by both those in power and those in pain.

The only reason we can talk about the Founding Fathers as a group is they got over their petty differences.

The only reason we can talk about the Founding Fathers as a group is they got over their petty differences.

“Civics”, as a concept, is usually taught as a lesson on the mechanics of a system. It’s usually quite tedious and completely devoid of the most important part of the basis of any good politics. Americans, as a people, appear to have not only ignored many of these lessons but are in some kind of open rebellion against the principles which guided the Founding Fathers to craft the system we have today – responsibility, consensus, and compromise.

Politics, for its part, is nothing more than the art and science of human interaction. Used with other terms like “office politics” or “domestic politics” the meaning becomes more clear, but in the abstract it’s considered something very ugly. Practicing politics, which is to say practicing the ability to get along with other people and get things done, is considered negative.

Starting from this perspective America today has absolutely nothing of any value going for it. That may seem harsh, but a failure to understand how intertwined our lives are at the most basic level possible means that we have absolutely no ability to take care of ourselves as a people.

Authoritarian rule is the only way to go, given this.

Angry White Guys - how important are they?

Angry White Guys – how important are they?

It doesn’t take much more than a casual think-through to see why this is utterly poisonous. We do indeed cooperate with each other constantly, as shown by our safe arrival home nearly every day in the example above.

Naturally, many of our relationships with everyone else are governed by the exchange of money, which is to say what we achieve after giving a quarter or so of our time to something that has generally been agreed is “productive”. The systems for determining this are analyzed as “economics” and are in some ways a different matter, but as we’ve explored before they also come down to a simple matter of our values. They become economic value through choices made as individuals and as a society as a whole, both.

Outside of these relationships, there are essential basic agreements which have nothing to do with law or money which are at the core of a society. Respect is a simple enough one which has fallen on hard times lately. Surrounded by glass and steel at 60 miles per hour the penalties for a lack of respect are obvious enough, but surrounded by the glow of a screen they appear much less so. It should be taken as obvious that no one truly knows what motivates someone else, yet how many articles, comments, and updates eventually wander into a phrase which starts, “You only say that because you …”?

This is the moment it all got weird.

This is the moment it all got weird.

The problem with this situation is that the separation from an actual human is just a bit greater than it is on the road – a place where “road rage” does indeed erupt on some rare occasions. At least when traveling there is a shared purpose and a well defined goal – we all want to get where we are going safely. In “politics” as we have come to understand it? All goals are personal, all goals revolve around power. Dominate the conversation, dominate the person, dominate the levers of power. Bend reality to your will and own it. There is no “us”, there is no civic imperative.

Thinking of it this way, it should seem obvious that what passes for “politics” today lives up to the presumption held by most people going into it – this is an ugly thing, so let’s make it as ugly as possible. Let’s ignore how much we rely on each other and the basic values which we do have in common. Let’s ignore respect and decency without any regard to the consequences because after all a “win” is what matters.

It’s obviously poison. It’s obviously nonsense, too. But it’s what has come to pass for “politics” – something utterly unrelated to the art and science of anything more than what feels good at the moment.

So let’s go back to road for a moment. Let’s go back to where the goal is obvious and where we do indeed largely cooperate. Let’s call that “civics” and start there. It’s about civilization and how it works.

One thought on ““Civics”

Like this Post? Hate it? Tell us!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s