Home » Money » Quantitative Easing

Quantitative Easing

The actions of the Federal Reserve have an air of dark wizardry about them – they are mysterious, powerful, and use forces that appear to be a kind of magic.  The most powerful incantation is the often-muttered “Quantitative Easing”, a spell that has moved from the dark recesses of economics into the popular press.  What it means, in the end, is that the Fed literally conjures money from thin air and gives it to the US government to go out and spur some kind of economic growth.  Though this handy li’l charm is now being openly discussed the reasons why it has become so useful have not.

You want to see a magic act?  This is one helluva trick.  It’s showtime at the Fed.

The term “Quantitative Easing” is a term that is designed to obfuscate and deflect from the start.  It came to us from Japan circa 2001, a time when interest rates with the central Bank of Japan were at zero and the economy was still flat and busted.  “Quantitative” refers to a set amount of money, and “Easing” means relaxation of credit that is tight despite the low interest rates.  It differs from the usual policy in that it isn’t a broad policy but a fixed amount of cash.

Quantitative Easing is used when the economy is in a period of deflation or a serious risk of it.  Money, as we know it, is nothing more than “The full faith and credit of the Federal Reserve”, which is to say a bunch of something that can grow and contract along with the economy.  It’s simply a matter of faith and nothing more, subject to the laws of supply and demand.  If there is too much of this “money” floating around it is worth less and goods and services start to require more of it – prices rise and we call it “inflation”.  If there’s too little “money” around people want more of it and prices fall in the same way.

Deflation may sound like a good thing, but it’s far worse.  That’s why it requires dark arts like Quantitative Easing to take it on.  I’ll leave the explanation to Ben Bernanke, then a Federal Reserve Governor (and not yet Chairman) on 21 November 2002:

With inflation rates now quite low in the United States, however, some have expressed concern that we may soon face a new problem–the danger of deflation, or falling prices. That this concern is not purely hypothetical is brought home to us whenever we read newspaper reports about Japan, where what seems to be a relatively moderate deflation–a decline in consumer prices of about 1 percent per year–has been associated with years of painfully slow growth, rising joblessness, and apparently intractable financial problems in the banking and corporate sectors. While it is difficult to sort out cause from effect, the consensus view is that deflation has been an important negative factor in the Japanese slump.

This is an important speech for several reasons.  For one, it dates concerns about deflation – the hallmark of a Depression – as early as 2002.  Another reason is that it sets out the terms of Quantitative Easing and when it is a critical tool for a central bank.  Lastly, this is the speech that earned Ben Bernanke the nickname “Helicopter Ben” for bringing up the ultimate way to stimulate the economy – dropping freshly printed money out of a helicopter:

A broad-based tax cut, for example, accommodated by a program of open-market purchases to alleviate any tendency for interest rates to increase, would almost certainly be an effective stimulant to consumption and hence to prices. Even if households decided not to increase consumption but instead re-balanced their portfolios by using their extra cash to acquire real and financial assets, the resulting increase in asset values would lower the cost of capital and improve the balance sheet positions of potential borrowers. A money-financed tax cut is essentially equivalent to Milton Friedman’s famous “helicopter drop” of money.

Not only does it make for a fun nickname, it’s a much better image than that of a dark wizard waving a wand with the strange moniker “Quantitative Easing”.

The Federal Reserve has, so far, purchased about $2 trillion in US government bonds using money that it more-or-less simply created on its own balance sheets out of thin air.  That money went forth and is supposed to be doing great things for the economy.  They will likely give us another round of Quantitative Easing, aka “QE2”, estimated to be about $1 trillion more, in the next few weeks.  The stock market is up on the joyous news that the Fed will do whatever it takes – even if some of us think it should be down on the grim reality that this is a tacit acknowledgment that we are in a lingering Depression, not a “Great Recession”.

Quantitative Easing is a simple yet powerful kind of magic.  It’s worth getting to know because it shoves big and arcane ideas like “economy” and “money” into an interesting new perspective.  It’s all about management, not something tangible and fixed.  When the principles given this charge have the allure of being dark wizards we live in less of a democratic republic and more of a strange pagan theocracy.  The more we know about the managers of our economic fate, the better.  It’s not that dark or that magic after all – at least not any more than we make it so by not paying attention.

Advertisements

30 thoughts on “Quantitative Easing

  1. Thank you! I’ve heard this term and had no idea what it meant. I can see why no one wants to explain it, this is very strange and scary. If they really are just printing up to $3 Trillion things must be very bad.

  2. It’s worse than that, Anna. For one thing, what if it doesn’t work – like the first round? Keep trying it and pumping more money into the economy? For another thing it does challenge us all to re-evaluate what all this stuff means in our daily lives.

    Some lefties (like me) get upset when people angrily shout the anti-tax mantra, “It’s my money!” because they (reasonably) don’t like the word “my”. I get upset because of the word “money”. It’s nothing more than a way of keeping score, something that is only defined in a social sense in the first place. Anyone who stops and thinks about this stuff has to realize that without some kind of agreement, ie a “social contract, it’s all perfectly meaningless.

    I hope that QE and QE2 (hopefully there won’t be a QE3!) will get people to realize this.

  3. I was going to suggest this term (QE) for you but didn’t. Liked your take on it. How does it play out politically?

  4. Thanks, Dan. I don’t know how this plays out politically – a lot depends on how much people get “into it” and understand what’s going on. As long as they get to use technical jargon (and it isn’t translated inthe popular press) I think that it’ll go over most people’s heads. I think that’s a real shame if it goes down that way.

    BTW, I was searching for when I first wrote about this. I didn’t say anything directly when we had QE1 because there was so much else going on – I kept it in context. But I did make this joke on April Fool’s Day 2007:

    http://tinyurl.com/3lcgl8

    This was back when I was a “perma-bear” to many people. 🙂

  5. Pingback: Work Creates Wealth | Barataria – The work of Erik Hare

  6. Pingback: Jargon | Barataria – The work of Erik Hare

  7. Pingback: G20 Finds its Seoul | Barataria – The work of Erik Hare

  8. Pingback: Deflation | Barataria – The work of Erik Hare

  9. Pingback: Making Stuff | Barataria – The work of Erik Hare

  10. Pingback: Overnight Wonder | Barataria – The work of Erik Hare

  11. Pingback: 2010? Meh. | Barataria – The work of Erik Hare

  12. Pingback: Economic Update | Barataria – The work of Erik Hare

  13. Pingback: The War on Reality | Barataria – The work of Erik Hare

  14. Pingback: Four Years On | Barataria – The work of Erik Hare

  15. Pingback: Structural Unemployment | Barataria – The work of Erik Hare

  16. Pingback: Inflation and “Real” | Barataria – The work of Erik Hare

  17. Pingback: Waiting for the “Go” | Barataria – The work of Erik Hare

  18. Pingback: Ben Bernanke | Barataria – The work of Erik Hare

  19. Pingback: Just Try Something | Barataria – The work of Erik Hare

  20. Pingback: Euro Contrast | Barataria – The work of Erik Hare

  21. Pingback: Print or Die | Barataria – The work of Erik Hare

  22. Pingback: One Crisis at a Time, Please | Barataria – The work of Erik Hare

  23. Pingback: Bad News is Good News | Barataria – The work of Erik Hare

  24. Pingback: Velocity of Money | Barataria – The work of Erik Hare

  25. Pingback: Jubilee | Barataria – The work of Erik Hare

  26. Pingback: QE3 | Barataria – The work of Erik Hare

  27. Pingback: Work Creates All Wealth | Barataria – The work of Erik Hare

  28. Pingback: Money is a Tool | Barataria – The work of Erik Hare

  29. Pingback: Cheers for the Underground Economy! | Barataria - The work of Erik Hare

  30. Pingback: Fed Funds Future Foggy, Fudgy | Barataria - The work of Erik Hare

Like this Post? Hate it? Tell us!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s