Home » People & Culture » Player Piano

Player Piano

Kurt Vonnegut’s 1952 novel “Player Piano” was more than his first. It was arguably the first “dystopian utopia” novel of a world carefully described and proscribed for everyone involved. Those with technical degrees were the masters of the carefully planned world, and the rest either joined the army or worked for the “Reconstruction and Reclamation Corps” building infrastructure. Government took care of everyone, but not all were happy. Rebellion steeped under the calm surface in both the working class and the unchallenged rulers.

It’s hard to not think of such a world when reading “AI, Robotics, and the Future of Jobs” from the Pew Research Center and Elon University. A survey of 1,896 experts in technical areas were asked what they thought the future world of employment might look like – how much automation might displace workers and how many jobs it might create. The results read something like Vonnegut imagined – enough so that a little anxiety about the next economy is justified.

Vonnegut knew the score.

Vonnegut knew the score.

The survey started with a tough question. “Self-driving cars, intelligent digital agents that can act for you, and robots are advancing rapidly. Will networked, automated, artificial intelligence (AI) applications and robotic devices have displaced more jobs than they have created by 2025?” About half (48%) thought that technology will displace more jobs than it creates, and the other half (52%) assumed technology would create more. It’s hardly an overwhelming response.

But it gets more interesting when the researchers drilled down into the reasons each side believed their case and what has to be done about it.

The cases for technology creating jobs are more interesting, and write far sexier headlines. It boils down to “technology has always created more jobs” as much as anything. But a delicate analysis was put well by John Markoff, senior writer for the Science section of the New York Times.“You didn’t allow the answer that I feel strongly is accurate—too hard to predict. There will be a vast displacement of labor over the next decade. That is true. But, if we had gone back 15 years who would have thought that ‘search engine optimization’ would be a significant job category?”

The fuure has to have room for everyone, 'cuz we're all going there.

The fuure has to have room for everyone, ‘cuz we’re all going there.

The case against technology creating jobs comes down to the observation that we have realized a divided society, where there is less work for the unskilled but nearly unlimited opportunities for those with technical degrees. Justin Reich, a fellow at Harvard University’s Berkman Center for Internet & Society, said, “Robots and AI will increasingly replace routine kinds of work—even the complex routines performed by artisans, factory workers, lawyers, and accountants. There will be a labor market in the service sector for non-routine tasks that can be performed interchangeably by just about anyone—and these will not pay a living wage.”

It’s the likely growth of income inequality that will be the biggest obstacle as the skills gap widens. And that’s when the two sides start to come together.

Both sides agree that education systems have to change to accommodate the need for new skills – and keep changing as new jobs open up in areas we can’t imagine right now. And somehow the income will be distributed more evenly if we all embrace the leisure time that opens up – either by convention or, perhaps by laws that limit the workweek.

What a "job" used to mean for many.

What a “job” used to mean for many.

Hal Varian, chief economist for Google, envisions a future with fewer ‘jobs’ but a more equitable distribution of labor and leisure time: “The work week has fallen from 70 hours a week to about 37 hours now, and I expect that it will continue to fall. This is a good thing. Everyone wants more jobs and less work. Robots of various forms will result in less work, but the conventional work week will decrease, so there will be the same number of jobs (adjusted for demographics, of course). This is what has been going on for the last 300 years so I see no reason that it will stop in the decade.”

Given the demographic challenges as a smaller share of the workforce is employed, and indeed if it is true that there is already a limited amount of paid work to go around, the challenges are severe. But demographics favor the young as Baby Boomers start to retire and open up opportunities, one way or the other. It’s hard to tell exactly where it is going.

But the Pew Center study makes a good read for anyone concerned about the future – as does “Player Piano”. What will the role be for government as we move to a world more driven by technology and leisure? How will it be organized? The parts that the Pew Study leaves out are at least as fascinating as what they covered. But it’s a good conversation to start, no matter what.

10 thoughts on “Player Piano

  1. The comment that said it best is that people have gone from 72 hours a week to 40 and we can expect that to drop. I hope that doesn’t mean a bunch of new laws but if we can get to that point there could be full employment. If people don’t want to work more there are more jobs to go around & they should pay better. How that comes tgether I don’t know.

  2. What we need is inspiration:

    “Now the trumpet summons us again—not as a call to bear arms, though arms we need; not as a call to battle, though embattled we are—but a call to bear the burden of a long twilight struggle, year in and year out, “rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation”—a struggle against the common enemies of man: tyranny, poverty, disease, and war itself.”

  3. People are already working less if they can get away with it. It’s all in what you choose in life. If you can make enough to pay the bills in 20 hours most of the people I know do. Maybe that’s a generation thing but it is happening.

  4. There needs to be more opportunity for kids especially who don’t know what they want to do. There should be no shame in just getting out and getting a job right out of school

  5. Pingback: Redefining Work | Barataria - The work of Erik Hare

  6. Pingback: Capital Idea | Barataria - The work of Erik Hare

  7. Pingback: Fight for $15 | Barataria - The work of Erik Hare

  8. Pingback: Growth is … ? | Barataria - The work of Erik Hare

  9. Pingback: Work For All? | Barataria - The work of Erik Hare

  10. Pingback: Work Redefined | Barataria - The work of Erik Hare

Like this Post? Hate it? Tell us!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s